<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Greenonions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.greenonions.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.greenonions.com</link>
	<description>This is not a cooking blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:13:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Decision-Based Design by Richard Warzecha</title>
		<link>http://blog.greenonions.com/2010/01/20/decision-based-design/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Warzecha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 18:13:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.greenonions.com/?p=142#comment-54</guid>
		<description>Dan, thanks for reposting this. Great ideas are timeless, it&#039;s a pity we have to stare at them for so long before many of us do anything great with them.

I like what this means for the convergence of content strategy and information architecture. A process like you describe should force the question: &quot;What does the user need to make a decision in this state/page?&quot; Part of that is what message or content they need to be presented (often a concern of Content Strategists), another part is what functionality needs be presented (traditionally a concern of IAs). 

When we view it that way, it&#039;s clear we need a unified approach, with its own vocabulary, structure, and process. From my view this floats at some higher level than Content Strategy and Information Architecture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, thanks for reposting this. Great ideas are timeless, it&#8217;s a pity we have to stare at them for so long before many of us do anything great with them.</p>
<p>I like what this means for the convergence of content strategy and information architecture. A process like you describe should force the question: &#8220;What does the user need to make a decision in this state/page?&#8221; Part of that is what message or content they need to be presented (often a concern of Content Strategists), another part is what functionality needs be presented (traditionally a concern of IAs). </p>
<p>When we view it that way, it&#8217;s clear we need a unified approach, with its own vocabulary, structure, and process. From my view this floats at some higher level than Content Strategy and Information Architecture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Decision-Based Design by David Airey on letterpress; Decision-Based Design &#171; Design and Innovation Daily</title>
		<link>http://blog.greenonions.com/2010/01/20/decision-based-design/#comment-53</link>
		<dc:creator>David Airey on letterpress; Decision-Based Design &#171; Design and Innovation Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 07:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.greenonions.com/?p=142#comment-53</guid>
		<description>[...] On a completely unrelated topic, Dan Brown republished a 2005 article in which he describes an unusual approach to software design. Instead of using functional specifications, information architecture, or user personas as the main drivers of the design process, Brown focused on the large and complex set of decisions that users must make while using the software; he treated the software as a system built primarily to support the users&#8217; decision-making: &#8220;Decision-Based Design.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On a completely unrelated topic, Dan Brown republished a 2005 article in which he describes an unusual approach to software design. Instead of using functional specifications, information architecture, or user personas as the main drivers of the design process, Brown focused on the large and complex set of decisions that users must make while using the software; he treated the software as a system built primarily to support the users&#8217; decision-making: &#8220;Decision-Based Design.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Decision-Based Design by Dan</title>
		<link>http://blog.greenonions.com/2010/01/20/decision-based-design/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:06:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.greenonions.com/?p=142#comment-52</guid>
		<description>This approach is really interesting. Have you (or have others) written more about this? Did you get a sense of how effective the process would be, compared to more traditional techniques?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This approach is really interesting. Have you (or have others) written more about this? Did you get a sense of how effective the process would be, compared to more traditional techniques?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Decision-Based Design by charlene</title>
		<link>http://blog.greenonions.com/2010/01/20/decision-based-design/#comment-51</link>
		<dc:creator>charlene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 19:32:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.greenonions.com/?p=142#comment-51</guid>
		<description>Thanks for re-posting this. It&#039;s just the kind of detailed day-to-day process stuff I love hearing about. I&#039;m curious how do you think the activity of creating decision lists differs (if it does differ) from task analysis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for re-posting this. It&#8217;s just the kind of detailed day-to-day process stuff I love hearing about. I&#8217;m curious how do you think the activity of creating decision lists differs (if it does differ) from task analysis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Poster: Representing Data in Wireframes (IA Summit 2005) by Livia Labate</title>
		<link>http://blog.greenonions.com/2009/05/01/poster-representing-data-in-wireframes-ia-summit-2005/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Livia Labate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2009 15:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.greenonions.com/?p=118#comment-28</guid>
		<description>Yay, the end of four years of randomly looking for it on old folders in my hard drive when I need it ;-P Seriously, glad you posted it, it&#039;s a great poster and the content is top notch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay, the end of four years of randomly looking for it on old folders in my hard drive when I need it ;-P Seriously, glad you posted it, it&#8217;s a great poster and the content is top notch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reflections on the 2009 IA Summit by javiervelasco</title>
		<link>http://blog.greenonions.com/2009/03/24/reflections-on-the-2009-ia-summit/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>javiervelasco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 03:14:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.greenonions.com/?p=64#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Great summary Dan, thanks for sharing this.

Regarding your first point on a core idea, this is something I&#039;d been talking about since the 2004 and 2005 summits in terms of the Central Communication Concept and Central Creative Concept that is used in advertising. I showed this in a 2004 poster http://mantruc.com/files/ia-comm-letter.pdf and 2005 presentation http://mantruc.com/publications/experience-message.html and  http://tinyurl.com/dd97ln

Hope this helps!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great summary Dan, thanks for sharing this.</p>
<p>Regarding your first point on a core idea, this is something I&#8217;d been talking about since the 2004 and 2005 summits in terms of the Central Communication Concept and Central Creative Concept that is used in advertising. I showed this in a 2004 poster <a href="http://mantruc.com/files/ia-comm-letter.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://mantruc.com/files/ia-comm-letter.pdf</a> and 2005 presentation <a href="http://mantruc.com/publications/experience-message.html" rel="nofollow">http://mantruc.com/publications/experience-message.html</a> and  <a href="http://tinyurl.com/dd97ln" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/dd97ln</a></p>
<p>Hope this helps!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reflections on the 2009 IA Summit by ian alexander</title>
		<link>http://blog.greenonions.com/2009/03/24/reflections-on-the-2009-ia-summit/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>ian alexander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.greenonions.com/?p=64#comment-12</guid>
		<description>To your last paragraph—the application of the practical would be a nice contrast to the theoretical. Additionally, I (as a newbie) was/am most interested in the merging of practices which was spoke of only by the minority. 

Ian Alexander
Eat Media</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To your last paragraph—the application of the practical would be a nice contrast to the theoretical. Additionally, I (as a newbie) was/am most interested in the merging of practices which was spoke of only by the minority. </p>
<p>Ian Alexander<br />
Eat Media</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Reflections on the 2009 IA Summit by John Yesko</title>
		<link>http://blog.greenonions.com/2009/03/24/reflections-on-the-2009-ia-summit/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator>John Yesko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.greenonions.com/?p=64#comment-11</guid>
		<description>Great write-up, Dan. I share many of your perspectives on the Summit. 

You guys are doing some impressive things at EightShapes, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great write-up, Dan. I share many of your perspectives on the Summit. </p>
<p>You guys are doing some impressive things at EightShapes, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My Book by sorin</title>
		<link>http://blog.greenonions.com/my-book/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>sorin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.greenonions.com/?page_id=37#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Great book but while reading the book I cannot help myself taking notes and making it shorter :) I feel that I should have a short handbook after passing through all  the book in order to use this for any future web related project.

Also, templates(for wireframes, prototypes and persona creation) would help a lot while going through the process.

Overall, I find this book the Bible of every web project. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great book but while reading the book I cannot help myself taking notes and making it shorter <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  I feel that I should have a short handbook after passing through all  the book in order to use this for any future web related project.</p>
<p>Also, templates(for wireframes, prototypes and persona creation) would help a lot while going through the process.</p>
<p>Overall, I find this book the Bible of every web project. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contradictory Data and Rigorous Sorting by elise</title>
		<link>http://blog.greenonions.com/2009/03/01/contradictory-data-and-rigorous-sorting/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>elise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 19:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.greenonions.com/?p=23#comment-3</guid>
		<description>canny timing on that. this also came through my feed reader today:

Microsoft’s Vision for 2019 is Data Visualization
http://flowingdata.com/2009/03/02/microsofts-vision-for-2019-is-data-visualization/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>canny timing on that. this also came through my feed reader today:</p>
<p>Microsoft’s Vision for 2019 is Data Visualization<br />
<a href="http://flowingdata.com/2009/03/02/microsofts-vision-for-2019-is-data-visualization/" rel="nofollow">http://flowingdata.com/2009/03/02/microsofts-vision-for-2019-is-data-visualization/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
